The previous sections established why European unification is necessary: fragmented nation-states can no longer secure our collective self-determination. Only by achieving continental scale can Europeans recover genuine sovereign agency. The question now is practical: how to translate that necessity into a legitimate founding process capable of creating a new European State.

 

 

The Constitutional Bootstrap Problem

 

European unification confronts a foundational constraint: no existing European or national institution currently holds the legal authority to unilaterally dissolve the existing nation-states and create a new sovereign entity. The European Union’s treaty architecture offers procedures for profound reform, but precisely where change becomes constitutional in scope it encounters the hard limit of unanimity and national ratification — an arrangement that, in practice, leads to gridlock.

 

This is the constitutional bootstrap problem: the legal authority to establish a new system cannot come from within the existing one, because the old system is precisely what would be transformed. In a strict legal sense, the circle appears closed: legitimate constituent authority seems to presuppose a constitution; yet a constitution presupposes legitimate constituent authority. The question is therefore not merely procedural. It is political in the deepest sense: where does founding legitimacy come from?

 

 

Law as Instrument

 

There are, in principle, multiple legal and quasi-legal pathways that could be invoked to advance unification:

• Treaty revision under Article 48 TEU provides the formal route for “constitutional” change within the EU framework, but it ultimately depends on unanimous agreement among member states and ratification according to national constitutional requirements.

• Enhanced cooperation allows a group of member states to move forward together when consensus is blocked, without forcing the unwilling to participate — yet it remains bounded by the existing treaties and cannot, by itself, conjure a new sovereign state.

• Intergovernmental treaties among willing states can be concluded outside the treaty framework when urgency is high; Europe has seen this logic before, in different forms, from Schengen’s origins outside the EU treaties to later incorporation into EU law, to major agreements such as the Fiscal Compact.

​

These routes matter. They define possible instruments and sequencing. But none of them is self-executing; none generates the will required to activate it. Law is a medium of action, not its source.

 

 

Where Legitimacy Resides

 

For Generation Europe, the constitutional bootstrap problem clarifies a more fundamental truth: legitimacy ultimately rests on popular will. This holds true across all systems, but is especially evident in democracies. Institutions and constitutions are the forms through which sovereignty is expressed; they are not the substance of sovereignty itself.

 

History is unambiguous on this point: constitutional transformation follows collective determination; it does not precede it. When a sufficiently large and organised public demands a new order with clarity and resolve, what once appeared legally “impossible” becomes unavoidable — and then, rapidly, technically manageable.

 

Without a social base capable of conferring legitimacy, even the most elegant legal pathway remains inert.

 

 

The Community as the Strategic Asset

 

This is why our plan begins where real power begins: with the construction of a European civic community. Generation Europe will engage seriously with constitutional design, legal innovation, and institutional architecture. But our first task is prior to all drafting: to build the largest, most organised community of young Europeans committed to unification, capable of acting together and sustaining a common demand over time.

 

A community of this kind is not a symbolic audience; it is a strategic asset. It creates bargaining power — the ability to shift incentives for governments, parties, and institutions; the ability to make obstruction costly; the ability to force the opening of constituent pathways that would otherwise remain sealed.

 

In practical terms, it is what can turn a distant ideal into a concrete mandate: a social base capable of legitimising a constituent process — whether through elections, referenda, a constituent assembly, or a combination of legal routes — because the authority behind it is unmistakable.

 

Generation Europe seeks to build that force first — patiently, methodically, and at scale.

 

 

Building Capacity

 

To transform dispersed conviction into coordinated capacity, Generation Europe must operate simultaneously as a media organisation capable of reaching millions and as a network of local groups capable of translating online engagement into real-world mobilisation.

 

We pursue this through three parallel lines of action:

 

1. Digital First: Building a Continental Public
   The most direct way to reach our generation is where it lives: on digital platforms. We are building a powerful presence across the major social networks, not as a marketing exercise, but as the infrastructure of a new European public sphere — visible, continuous, and scalable.
   Around this core, we will build an expanding ecosystem of formats (podcasts, video series, newsletters, live conversations, briefings, and curated content) designed for three purposes: to inform our community with transparency and intellectual seriousness; to educate it in the strategic realities of power, sovereignty, and institutional design; and to engage it through content compelling enough to sustain attention, stimulate discussion, and turn passive followers into active participants.
   
   A movement that cannot communicate at scale cannot organise at scale.
    

2. On the Ground: Territorial Networks
   Digital reach is necessary, but it is not sufficient. A community becomes durable and effective only when it is capable of coordination, trust, and disciplined action. For this reason, we bring Generation Europe into the territory through local chapters  — concentrated initially in universities, where a genuinely European generation is already present in density, but extending to civic groups open to citizens beyond academic settings.
   These groups serve as the organisational backbone of the movement: spaces for civic formation, recruitment, mutual support, and concrete initiatives. They translate a continental mission into local presence, transforming online participation into durable civic capacity — capable of mobilising, convening, and acting in coordination across cities and countries.
    

3. Expertise and Alliances: Building the Capability to Found
   Simultaneously, we cultivate the technical and institutional competence without which ambition remains rhetorical. Generation Europe surrounds itself with serious expertise: constitutional scholars capable of navigating complex legal pathways; policy specialists who understand fiscal architecture and defence integration; economists who can model the implications of unified capital markets; security analysts who grasp the logic of deterrence and strategic autonomy.
   In parallel, we build a broader network of aligned actors who recognise the necessity of a sovereign Europe and can support its construction in different ways: entrepreneurs and businesses that understand continental economic integration as a prerequisite for competing at scale; research institutions and universities able to provide intellectual resources, policy analysis, and academic legitimacy; civil society organisations committed to democratic accountability and transnational solidarity; media outlets and cultural producers who see European sovereignty as a condition for preserving diverse voices against homogenising external forces.

 

 

A Community That Generates Its Own Leadership

 

Crucially, the movement’s operational capacity is drawn from the community itself. As the community grows, it produces the people who sustain it: organisers for local chapters; communicators skilled in platform-specific strategies; researchers and writers who can inform the public with rigour; strategists who refine messaging for diverse audiences; and legally minded members who support constitutional work.

 

In this sense, the community is not only our base. It is our engine — the source of legitimacy, leverage, and leadership. We are building the capacity to carry a transformative project forward as a democratic mandate, not as an elite initiative. When that force reaches sufficient scale and organisational capacity, the question shifts from whether European unification is legally possible to how existing institutions respond to a mobilised European demand. At that point, constitutional mechanisms become instruments for formalising a reality we have helped to create.

 

This is the plan.